Cross-border
economic
development
26
Territory portraits: economic development on different borders
Labour market
The rate of unemployment on either side of the Rhine differs substantially.
On the French side, in the first quarter of 2013, unemployment in Alsace
stood at 9.5%. Looking at the detail by employment area reveals a more
contrasting situation, with 60% of the region’s job-seekers concentrated
in Strasbourg (10.6%) and Mulhouse (11.6%), while the employment
area around Saint-Louis (6%) benefits from its proximity to the Basel
economy. On the Swiss and German sides, the figures point to a much
more favourable economic climate, with unemployment at 4% in the
Land of Baden-Württemberg and the Canton of Basel-City.
34
Historically, the Upper Rhine region has been characterised by substantial
cross-border flows due to the close cultural and linguistic ties between
the different sides of the border. North-West Switzerland is the main
destination of these workers, with 31,000 of them being French and
27,500 German. Another 28,000 French people travel daily to work in
Germany. Very few workers appear to leave the Swiss cantons, and
France only hosts a few hundred cross-border workers.
35
The recent
economic crisis has led to a temporary slowdown in flows of cross-
border workers, which have however picked up again in recent months.
Nonetheless, public and private players are in agreement that the
Alsatians’ lack of qualifications and the decline of their German language
skills restrict their mobility to employment areas where qualified workers
are very much needed.
Ì
Ì
The cross-border placement of job-seekers service
was
reinforced since 2013 by the setting up of three cross-border
placement services along the French-German border.
36
In terms
of vocational training and apprenticeships, efforts also led to
the signing, on 12 September 2013, of a framework agreement
regarding cross-border apprenticeships in the Upper Rhine, which
settles, among other things, the question of apprenticeship tax,
which is covered entirely by the Alsace Region. However, it remains
to motivate potential French candidates who appear reluctant to
take up this opportunity.
Players in cross-border economic
governance
Public action in this area is more extensive in France, where the Region of
Alsace has traditionally been a leading player. Currently in the process of
developing its Alsace 2030 strategy, the regional authority has identified
cross-border action as an area for development and are involving Swiss
and German partners in their planning workshops.
The Urban Community of Strasbourg, which has recently expanded its
Economic Development Directorate, has become increasingly aware of
the advantage of an economic strategy at the cross-border level and in
2009 drew up its strategic road map Strasbourg 2020, which includes
a cross-border section and several cross-border projects, some of
which are mentioned above.
34
Source:
Le tissu
économique
en Alsace et dans la CUS:
évolution
2008-2013 (The economic
fabric of Alsace and the Urban Community of Strasbourg: developments in 2008-2013)
, Les
indicateurs de l’ADEUS, issue 66, March 2014.
35
Source:
www.eures-t-rhinsuperieur.eu36
For more information, see the Project Factsheet.
It should also be noted – and this is much more unusual on account
of the distribution of public-sector competences in France – that the
Haut-Rhin Department, faced with a considerable competitiveness
differential due to the proximity of Basel, has mobilised its resources to
support cross-border initiatives, in particular for territorial infrastructure
and development projects (IBA Basel 2020 and 3Land projects).
Another important point is that the three chambers of commerce and
industry (CCI) in Alsace have merged their departments dedicated to
cross-border action into the Cross-Border Cooperation Directorate at
the CCI Alsace, providing a single point of contact for the Swiss and
German consular chambers.
Ì
Ì
In the area of employment, the Strasbourg Jobs and Training
Centre (Maison de l’emploi et de la formation de Strasbourg), which
includes Pôle Emploi (France’s public employment agency), the
Bundesagentur für Arbeit and German business representatives on
its executive board, leads
a cross-border GPEC (forward-looking
management of jobs and skills) for port-related professions
.
Central government departments participate actively in the EURES
partnership via the DIRECCTE (Regional Directorate for Business,
Competition, Consumers and Employment).
On the French side, therefore, there is multi-layered public involvement,
which is not however coordinated, for political reasons.
At the cross-border level, there are cooperation bodies such as the
Upper Rhine Conference and the Upper Rhine Trinational Metropolitan
Region, the economic component of which brings together the chambers
of commerce and industry (CCIs) of the three countries.
It remains difficult to establish coordination with the German and
Swiss systems, however. Dialogue is easier with Germany, where CCIs
have a similar status to the French counterparts and where economic
competence is shared between municipalities and the Länder. Such
cooperation has been much more difficult with Switzerland, with its
economically liberal and pragmatic traditions, where the CCIs are
private and independent organisations.
Ì
Ì
The TransInfoNet network
, which since 1996 has brought together
the five Chambers of Trades of the cross-border region in order to
offer both legal and administrative support for cross-border service
provision, constitutes a more consolidated partnership structure.
Last February’s vote, the implications of which remain unclear
in terms of the region’s economic stability, has cooled relations
with Switzerland. The development of economic cooperation is
therefore on hold for the time being.